Your Daily Strength Rotating Header Image

Theology

This category identifies entries related to theological studies and doctrine.

Will You Love YHWH?

What I enjoy about the final section of the Pentateuch is that the summation of what has been taught to Israel through this giving of the Law and in the manifestation of the presence of the Lord by way of signs and wonders is to garner a response from God’s people. Quite obviously, this place of response is not without significant influence and persuasion from YHWH. The response is to choose to take on the covenant with YHWH or no (Deut 30:19). I think this is one of the most significant themes concluding the Torah.

I did a little investigating into the Hebrew word for “choose,” bahar, because my theology is such that our very salvation and any ability to choose God, comes directly from God. Aquinas articulated this as operative and cooperative graces. God initiates and we may choose to cooperate with him. So my question when reading the text was how far to take this “choice” thing. Does God lead us to the fountain and leave us to drink on our own or does he push our face into the water while yelling, “drink it!” I think he does the latter for me. It’s a hair splitting question and much ink has been spilled on it. When do God’s work end and the human being’s work begin? Or is it encapsulated in an inseparable mix of activities so that it causes tension for our finite minds?

In looking into bahar, I found some solace. It’s not that all my questions are answered, but I think I’ve been able to move forward. The word and its derivations carry the idea of divine choice (BDB). This sort of a decision “always involves a careful, well thought-out choice” (TWOT). The same word was used when lot “chose” his route when he and Abram separated ways, for example. And in looking at this section of Deuteronomy closely, it appears to be a recap of events. So then this recap is written to remind Israel of all that YHWH has done: his works, his commands, and his admonitions. And with this information Israel is to decide to take one path or another. Either they may continue with YHWH and invoke his covenant or they may follow other idols. The decision is not so much aimed at Israel as a whole, but a question directed to each man, woman, and child.

What’s more is that God gives plenty of evidence that, come what may, he will remain faithful; even if his people make failures on their part. John Owens speaks to this in his short Deuteronomy text. He says that this sort of motif of being scattered, dispersed, and returned (like as in the Exile) asks a noticeable question: what have you learned, Israel (94)? Has God and will God ever abandon you? This word is not given to Israel only, but is also sent to future generations and foreigners that have been welcomed into Israel’s company (Deut 29:13-14)! What an encouraging reminder and what divinely inspired persuasion from our God! He has not simply said, Israel will you serve me? Make up your mind! No, he says this by way of a track record of promise and provision. I love when Owens says that “the people must take courage, for the Lord goes forth with them and is ever present to them, even when the Lord is seemingly hidden or absent” (92). These reminders serve to show us God’s presence and faithfulness without discounting our role in accepting our appropriate responsibilities for such a relationship.

As we walk out our walk in life, we sometimes do not understand the things we go through. Israel certainly did not. That is something common to all of us. But God reminds us that he “has not given you a heart to understand, or eyes to see, or ears to hear until this day” (Deut 29:3). He leads us through our wildernesses without tooting and blowing his horn until we pass through that desert and find ourselves face to face with the reality of his protection and provision. Then he sort of removes the veil and allows us, as he allowed Israel, to see how he was there the whole time. Now we have enough information to make an informed decision. Not only does this inspire maturity in faith and trust in God, but it also confirms his presence among his people: no matter how we feel about it. And that presence, oh fellow saints of God, is one he has wrapped around us and simply asks, do you want to continue with me?

One thing that Apostle Paul wrote that sticks out in thinking about this is reflected in Philippians 4:12-13. Paul says that he has learned he can do all things through Christ. But what has been difficult for translations to truly capture is that the words Paul uses carry the idea that through all of his lived circumstances, in want, in need, in surplus, in prison, in receiving beatings, etc., they have “instructed” (“Literally, “initiated” in a secret teaching, which is a mystery unknown to the world” – JFB) him to conclude that through Christ he gains power to face anything life dishes out. What is unknown to those outside the faith is the length God has gone to for his people and the clear reality of his presence in doing so – even if we do not recognize that presence in the moment.

What an excellent conclusion for those who will dare to love the Lord God by obeying his voice (Deut 28:1).

Inspiring His People to Worship: The Beauty of Holiness

I’ve been working on a paper about the presence of God and the tabernacle. In working on a thesis at St. John’s University, one tends to develop an appreciation for the asthetics of tradition and how they inspire devotion. If God made such beauty in his creation such as precious stones and what can be wrought with the skill of his human creation, then God is honored and gorified when we appreciate such beautify and are thankful in reflecting back on its source. Anyway, in my research I read a helpful articulation in Brueggeman’s, Theology of the Old Testament, p. 428:

There is no doubt, moreover, that the liturgical experience in the temple has a powerful aesthetic dimension, for the God of Israel is known to be present in an environment of physical, visible loveliness. Thus Israel is summoned to worship Yahweh in a holy place of unspeakable splendor (Pss 29:2*, 96:9*; 1 Chr 16:29*; 2 Chr 20:21*). The old, familiar translation of the recurring phrase in these texts is “the beauty of holiness.” The NRSV prefers to render “holy splendor,” thus accenting awe, which precludes any ease or artistic coziness. What interests us in this recurring formula, rendered either way, is that the visibly powerful sense of presence in the shrine has a mark of holiness to it, which variously reflects symmetry, proportion, order, extravagance, awe, and overwhelmingness. This is a sense of the “surplus” of Yahweh, situated at the center of Israel’s life, which is experienced as visual and which from its central and dominant position resituates and recharacterizes everything in Israel’s mundane world in relation to this center of occupying holiness.

Confessing Christ & Remaining Faithful

During my graduate education at Northwestern College, Dr. Muska said something very important that advanced me theologically. I had formerly thought that salvation could be lost if one gave up, threw in the towel, or otherwise betrayed his or her faith. What Muska said was: 

We can’t lose our salvation.  

This didn’t fit into my theological schema. How can we be expected to live holy, but never worry about salvific matters? 

I remembered reading discussions that defended this idea through the articulation that if we fall away from the faith, then we really weren’t true believers in the first place. However, I know that there have been times in my life when I’ve been sure of things and later decided against them. Both perspectives were legitimate feelings and desires. I wouldn’t say that I didn’t really mean it at the time. I did. 

So how can I make sense of this? 

Ultimately, I was putting too many biscuits on the same warm, Thanksgiving plate of theology. This meal requires at least two plates. 

I owe a debt of gratitude to what Dr. Hewitson, also from Northwestern College, has added. From Old Testament to New Testament, the commands of God have always been both to Trust and Obey(I will be posting a review of Hewitson’s work in the near future)

We have two things going for us: Christ is perfection and faith pleases God. So then those who have trust in the promises of God attain the perfect righteousness of God that is available through the obedience of Christ. 

In the matter of salvation, Dr. Muska is absolutely correct. Salvation cannot be lost. As we believe on Christ there is no failure on our part that can cause the foundation of our faith to fall out from beneath us. 

In the matter of abandoning our faith, we can. But this requires purposeful acts. It does not happen because we missed some step in our sanctifying path. It requires our rejecting the faith. 

Dr. Bill Mounce posted an article that helps makes some sense out of how this can be so. In his recent post on Romans 9:10, Mounce says that “Christians are people who confess Christ.” It is when we “cease to confess and if we cease to believe” that we start affecting the new covenant we have made with our God in coming to him through Christ. This is different than losing salvation. This is abandonment and betrayal of the covenant. 

I think this is further supported by what Hosea 6:7 reveals. Transgressing or breaking the covenant requires an act of faithlessness (depending on Translation, see i.e. ESV vs. KJV). The Hebrew is bagad, and covers the semantic range of acting covertly or deceitfully to being unfaithful. For the limited purpose of this blog post, any of these words are sufficient to show that our salvation is never dependent on how well we follow, but how wholly we follow. 

This is how theologically we can affirm both that salvation cannot be lost and that God still requirement faithfulness from his people. To love God is to do acts of love upon him, even though as human beings we still fail so often. 

So then we shan’t lose heart. God is faithful. (Hey, I just read the King James Version – it’s contagious!) And he will not lose any of his sheep.

Justification and Joshua

“The secret things belong to the Lord our God, but the things that are revealed belong to us and to our children forever, that we may do all the words of this law.” Deuteronomy 29:29, ESV

I think Joshua 6 teaches us a lot about the nature of justification. It relates to this passage, I think, saying a lot about what we have been given in the fullness of the Christ. There is a treatment also in Colossians 2 woth checking out, regarding our need to stay in Christ and how that our faith has taken away the debt that was held against us! Amen.

The Israelites are instructed to destroy every living person in Jericho, and they do. Immediately, we are confronted with one of the hardest things in the Old Testament to understand in our day. Why would God destroy these people? It seems so harsh. It paints a picture of an angry and vengeful God, which is much different than the New Testament presentation of the gospel of Christ. It also
brings to the discussion the topic of ethnic cleansing. Was Israel, or was God, participating in this kind of behavior?

We tend to read modern conceptions into the biblical text. Reality is composed of our own experiences and perceptions. We try to understand things from where we are or where we’ve been. After all, what else can we do? But part of studying the word of God is attempting to think God’s thoughts after him. We live a faith seeking understanding. That being the case, we must remain teachable. We are not looking to forge the Bible into a shape we like, but to be molded by it. Our approach is to attempt to understand God’s message.

With that in mind, what answers does God provide regarding the destruction of Jericho? I find several pieces of information. 1.) Before the Israelites ever got to Jericho, there was fear of judgment looming in the city. 2.) God’s covenant is not with Israel alone, but with all those who will follow him. 3.) Secret things belong to God and only those things revealed belong to us.

First, Jericho was not without warning. Joshua sent spies to scope the land and people. His spies were protected by Rahab when the town guards came for them. Rahab wasn’t living holy, according to Scripture. She was a prostitute. Yet, she was justified and spared because of her faith or hope in God. Rahab knew judgment was coming and acknowledged it (Jos 1:9). The rest of the city did not. In time, God’s wrath confronts those who are against him.

Rahab’s behavior shows recognition of sin and of God’s authority. This leads to the second point: God told Israel that it is not only with them that he is making his covenant (Deu 29:14). Entering into covenant with God takes submission and honoring him as God: the king of the covenant. Part of that honoring is to observe his commands: to love him (i.e. do acts of love unto him). Because Rehab behaved that way, she was spared even though she was not an Israelite and was not perfect as far as what is required to be holy. Well, thank God! Maybe there is hope for me! She was protected under the covenant. All of Jericho had
this same opportunity, and refused it. Look at how this concept is present here in the first books of the Bible, not just later in the New Testament.

Finally, God has reserved some matters for himself. He has not disclosed everything to us. What we can know is what he has revealed to us (Deu 29:29). The rest of the way we have to walk out by faith. A child does not understand the parent’s command,
but, when obeyed, that parent saves the child from much harm. Afterwards, the child will see the fullness of the fruit and reason
for the commands.

When we follow God and his commands we will reap the fullness of them. Understanding is not a requirement except for perhaps in basic terms. That is, if we faint not in keeping the command to love God regardless of understanding His ways. We are justified by our love of God and His love of us who love Him. What circle of love! It was never about a certain ethnicity. It has always been about faith as a response to God’s love toward us.

Even though we do not understand right now, what is taking place in our lives is about responding lovingly to our God. Continue in those things God has led you to. In due season, you will reap a harvest you did not foresee. And oh how good his harvest season is! Love in Christ, Saints.

In Honor of July 7, 2011

In honor of 7/7/11, I thought the text of Deuteronomy 7:7-11 would be perfect:

7 It was not because you were more in number than any other people that the LORD set his love on you and chose you, for you were the fewest of all peoples, 8 but it is because the LORD loves you and is keeping the oath that he swore to your fathers, that the LORD has brought you out with a mighty hand and redeemed you from the house of slavery, from the hand of Pharaoh king of Egypt. 9 Know therefore that the LORD your God is God, the faithful God who keeps covenant and steadfast love with those who love him and keep his commandments, to a thousand generations, 10 and repays to their face those who hate him, by destroying them. He will not be slack with one who hates him. He will repay him to his face. 7:11 You shall therefore be careful to do the commandment and the statutes and the rules that I command you today. (Deuteronomy 7:7-11, ESV)

The election of those called by grace into fellowship with God through Christ Jesus is realized when faith is combine with obedience (2Thes 2:13). It is a requirement to both trust and to obey the voice of God. It is truly a saving grace that the Lord has called us, and yet that grace requires a response that doesn’t add anything to the call but latches onto it through a faith in active demonstration. A good example is the parable of the marriage feast (Mat 22:1-14).

But with that active faith that is obedient, we gain the testimony of God that we are heirs of the promise. Whoever believes in the Son of God has the testimony (1Joh 5:10) that God has given us eternal life through Him (1Joh 5:11). When our testimony is spoken about by God, it adds a certain amount of oomf to the testimony of others (3Joh 1:12). We can count on this grace and on this surety. When God speaks and confirms, we can stand strong!

Works of Love

What is a good wage? An acceptable harvest for our hunting and gathering depends on many things: like how much satisfaction we get from the work, if we feel compensation is honoring and not demeaning, for example. But those things seem to bring about one other criteria that is of major importance: our joy. To be able to provide a comfortable living for our loved ones feels pretty good. To be compensated in a way that respects our skill and our craft is most gratifying.

So what of a different kind of work? Is there another kind? Is there a work that can be done without human hands that also produces a harvest without hands? Perhaps, a harvest that is not consumed?

There is such a work. It is a work that increases in the joy it yields; even to a climax of ecstasy. It is a work that extends our life. By tending to this work, life is prolonged. To be sure, a long life is no indicator of the joy within it. It takes more than that. Jacob expressed that he had a long life of 130 years, but very few days of which were joyous for him (Gen 47:8-9). How so? Was there fruit that led to difficulties in life for Jacob? The Scriptures do say he was a trickster. Still, something was missing from the way he was doing life. It didn’t produce the joy it should have. Also, those who lived before the Noahic flood experienced the longest of lives. But their hearts grew ever harder (Gen 6:5) and unloving. Abraham in contrast is said to have died at a ripe old age: 175 years (Gen 25:7-8).

What is it that makes a life ripe? How does one achieve a life of satisfaction? If the fruit of the hands such as money, food, clothing, and shelter fade over time, there has to be something else that yields a better harvest; so that a person gets to the end of his or her life and declares that it has been a ripe one!

If we fear the Lord by keeping his commands, it is said that our life will be prolonged (Deut 6:2). The Hebrew word, arak, means “to make long.” Long life is seen to be a blessing. It is like an extension given for a life well-lived. Proverbs confirms this theme (Prov 9:10-11) by saing that our days will be multiplied for fearing the Lord. Arak is something given for keeping the commands of God. Yet, we realize in these examples that there is more. It is not the length of life that determines blessing. It is the contents of the life. “Life’s donation is more important than life’s duration, not how long one lives, but how well one lives” (TWOT). So then the adding and prolonging of days is a benefit when life is being well-lived. It would appear to be almost like a curse for a life not being lived well. A prolonged life of complication would be no blessing.

This fear and reverence of God does not come by following Law. We know we fail with keeping laws; especially, the demand of the high holiness of God’s laws. It comes quite another way. “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your might” (Deut 6:5). This requires a complete package of a life, doesn’t it? This is what it is to be “all in.” Heart, soul, might…that’s all we got! That’s a wrap. And by approaching life as a relationship of lovers between creator and the created, the commands of the Lord become written on the heart (Deu 6:6). They become a joy to do. It is this love that seems to be the key that produces the conditions of which God can extend blessing. And not just a blessing of lenth, but a blessing of rich contents to that length.

Saint Augustine made a fantastic statement about how the only good fruit is fruit that grows from the root of love:

“He that increaseth knowledge, increaseth sorrow, – not that the law is itself evil, but because the commandment has its good in the demonstration of the letter, not in the assistance of the spirit; and if this commandment is kept from the fear of punishment and not from the love of righteousness, it is servilely kept, not freely, and therefore it is not kept at all (On the Spirit and the Letter, XXVI. 45.).

Jesus affirmed that the Law and the Prophets were intended to get God’s people to love Him above all (Matt 22:37-40). It is out of this joy of loving God that His word becomes written on our heart. The distance between this new life that is given wholeheartedly to God and the old life of plaguesd by sin will grow until its final consummation in the glorious resurrection of His people. There becomes less of the life that is void of joy and satisfaction and purpose, and there becomes a life driven and inspired by love.

The first of these wholehearted expressions of our love toward God is our faith in His son who came for this very purpose: to justify those who put their faith in Him. God is love (1Joh 4:8). Jesus Christ is His son (Matt 16:16). The Holy Spirit is sent to live within us and guide us in His stead (John 14:16-17). So that love of God has been poured into you! The love of God dwells within. There is a soft voice that speaks. Listen. Love it. And extend joy in your life.

Following Jesus, The Servant King

Following Jesus, the Servant KingI appreciate the copy Zondervan sent of Dr. Jonathan Lunde’s new book, Following Jesus, The Servant King: A Biblical Theology of Covenantal Discipleship. They do so without the expectation for a positive review. Amazon carries the book as well. For other reviews, see the blog tour page.

I had the privilege of meeting Dr. Lunde at the Atlanta meeting of the Evangelical Theological Society’s national conference last November. So I looked forward to reviewing this book. Lunde has a good spirit about him and demonstrates a genuine care for and intimacy with Scripture.

Those elements certainly show through in his book. I thought it was very helpful. Lunde discloses his purpose for the book in the introductory chapter. He makes attempts to reiterate his original purpose throughout the text of the book. Another scholar who has done this well is Tom Holland in his Contours of Pauline Theology. I enjoyed Lunde’s ability to keep the discussion focused.

So what was the focus? It is on the continuity between the attributes of being a king and a servant. Lunde attempts to settled some of the tensions between those roles by answering the What, Why, and How question regarding our role in answering the call to follow after Jesus. Lunde does this through a covenantal approach to understanding biblical theology.

One thing to mention about covenantalists is that they don’t take the position that the only way to see continuity in the Scripture is through covenants. But rather covenants as one way in understanding the messages of the Bible. For those who are not familiar with covenantal theology this book is a strong place to start. Lunde higlights the major covenants and deals with their interplay in a clear way. Although not exhaustive, his coverage of the popularly accepted covenantal themes lays a strong foundation.

Lund then continues to isolate each of the questions (What, Why, How) and deal with them in-depth. What does it look like to be a disciple and what is demanded? Lunde answers by showing that a covenant begins with the grace of the one offering or initiating the covenant. We accept God’s covenant by grace and answer back with love in living out the covenant’s stipulations.

Why is it necessary to obey if Jesus’ grace covers all my sins? Lunde answers by showing that in many ways Jesus heightened the requirements of the Law. Jesus did this by raising the bar of love toward God and love towards our neighbors. Jesus said all the Law is hinged on our steadfast focus to loving God. If we love Him, we wont’ be focused on satisfying some rule, but in continuing a relationship that includes behavior conducive to the love we claim that we have for Him.

How do we answer this call when Jesus said his burden is light? Lunde shows the many ways in which the Law set down patterns of behavior. When we establish a pattern of lifestyle that reflects God’s work and his involvement in our lives, we enable Jesus to be present in the lives of his disciples. That makes the burdens light. Lunde takes an already-not-yet approach to the coming of the kingdom of Christ. Paul Schultz has pointed this out beautifully.

Lunde goes into far more detail and supports his conclusions with Scripture. Some bloggers such as Chris Blackstone have rightly commented on the richness of Lunde’s text. I want to be clear again that Lunde focuses on a discussion of the covenants as a way to pull out some very helpful themes on discipleship. It is not meant to include other dimensions of discipleship in the early church. Lunde’s text. is certainly complex in areas.

For these reasons, I also recommend Lunde’s work as a text for Spiritual Formation, or introductory Covenantal Theology. But this is not only helpful in an academic setting. I think this would serve as a good resource for independent learning just the same. It lays the groundwork for a Biblical Theology by way of a perspective of the covenants.

Lunde gives a terrific outline to what is involved in discipleship. His approach here on blending the roles of king and servant was rewarding and helpful to me. At his conclusion, Lunde gives practical ways in which we may live as informed servants and grace inspired kings. Lunde’s work is well worth your investment of time and money. This is also a resource that will pay dividends for quite some time. I will certainly be referring to it in the future. Highly recommended. Enjoy.

Regional SBL at Luther Seminary

Today begins the first day of the Regional SBL meetings. I’ve been preparing this morning and am looking forward to the fellowship and the sessions. I will be posting things of interests (well, at least what I think is of interest) that should be a blessing to you.

Self-Sacrifice and Old Testament Theology

Charles Halton has shared an intriguing comment on John Rogerson’s A Theology of the Old Testament: Cultural Memory, Communication, and Being Human. In my Biblical Theology coursework, I noticed a relational restoration theme throughout Scripture. I don’t think Dr. Glenny, my prof at the time, shared my perspective, but he did understand what I was talking about. It’s not from a human standpoint, although we do benefit, it is in the restoration of a severed, intimate relationship with our Creator that pervades our being and subsequent relationships on earth. Anyway, here’s the quote:

If the narratives that have been discussed in this chapter are understood as Urgeschichte in the sense of Aderno, that is, as stories that give expression to rationalities that underly the human need to survive and prosper in a world distorted and fragmented by human encounter with the environment and other  humans and their power structures, the following conclusions can be drawn.  The predominant rationality is one of self-interest.  At its best it protects not just individuals, but their immediate dependents.  Sarah is concerned for the future of her son Isaac, Rebekah for the advancement of her son Jacob.  Rachel is loyal to her husband Jacob rather than her father Laban.  At its worst, self-interest is contemptuous of kin ties that ought to bind humans in solidarity.  Cain murders his brother Abel, and Jacob tricks Esau, while Joseph’s brothers plot Joseph’s downfall.  Examples of the rationality of self-interest can be multiplied in the Bible, especially the so-called Court Chronicle of 2 Samuel 9-20, where David commits adultery and (in effect) murder, Amnon rapes his half-sister Tamar, Absalom murders Amnon, and Joab disposes of Absalom in warfare, against David’s explicit orders.  Standing in sharp contrast to the rationality of self-interest is the rationality of self-sacrifice.  Its clearest expression is the story of Ruth; but it is also implicit in Moses’ tragic commitment to the leadership of his people, and Jeremiah’s witness to a truth that costs him dearly.  God is cast in many human images in the Old Testament.  The one that comes the closest to the truth is that which sees the rationality of self-sacrifice as the clue to God’s nature (91).

Can God be Known Without Scripture? A Starting Point for a Theology

I’d like to petition responses on this entry. One of the starting places to be decided when developing a doctrine of Scripture or a method of doing theology is whether to begin with God or Scripture. The dilemma is that we know through Scripture we are given revelation concerning God; yet, creation itself speaks of God through natural or general revelation. In beginning with God we are saying he can be known in some way without Scripture. Some conclude this to indicate Scripture is therefore of no special revelation since God can be known without it. In beginning with Scripture we are saying God can only be truly known in light of God’s revelation of himself in Scripture.

Some theologians have begun a systematic theology with a description of God and others by describing the Scriptures first. Millard J. Erickson, Western Seminary, proposes a good method in his Christian Theology: address both simultaneously. God and Scripture play integral roles that shouldn’t be separated. One can’t know God without Scripture and one can’t receive Scripture’s testimony without an awareness of God. Evidence of these dilemmas may offer support for Erickson’s proposal.

As I’ve thought about this regarding my experience in coming to Christ, I remember that what ultimately decided my being as some call “saved” was a touch of the Holy Spirit. I had prior knowledge of God, but hadn’t experienced God as an interactive, relational being. There was a turning point in a church service that led to a response of either saying yes to life with the Lord or saying no. Looking back after that moment I remember instances where God was speaking to me and interceding on my behalf even though I didn’t notice it or maybe refused to embrace it.

One such occasion was when I was using acid and running wildly around a parking ramp when I was younger. I nearly jumped off the side of the five story ramp onto jagged rocks below due to my carelessness and the substance’s influence before “something’ pulled me off the ledge. My friends were ghost white. One of them said it was as if a hand pulled me from the ledge. Knowledge of God did not bring me intimacy with him. Knowledge brought awareness. That awareness led me to intimacy as God who revealed himself through Scripture and the guidance of his Holy Spirit.

So then do we begin organizing theology with some kind of basic awareness of God before we have the opportunity for intimacy with him through the Scriptures? Does God supply us the milk of general revelation before we come to the meat found in the Holy Scriptures? Or do both work together as Erickson, for example, has proposed? I’d like to hear your thoughts and/or experiences. In the multitude of council, there is safety.